Legal Opinion

Schwarz v. Waddell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 10, 1982No. 79-1855PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKSTEIN, Judge.

This case has a long procedural history which we hope to finally conclude. The facts have been recited in full in Schwarz v. Waddell, 389 So.2d 210 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), rev’d, 405 So.2d 978 (Fla.1981). Remanding the case, the supreme court directed us to consider the three remaining grounds urged by relator in his petition for a writ of prohibition. Since none involves questions of jurisdiction appropriate for issuance of the writ, we deny his petition.

The three issues facing us are (1) whether garnishment under section 61.12, Florida Statutes (1979),1 may be obtained prior…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. English v. McCrarySupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Dawson v. DawsonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Gersten v. GerstenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. Sokolsky v. KuhnSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  5. State ex rel. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. UpchurchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gibson v. BennettSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Marriage of Griffin v. ReeveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Pease v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. Grobleski v. GrobleskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Smathers v. CraneVolusia County Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API