Legal Opinion
McAfee v. Harden
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 6, 1937No. 26846PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
McAfee and Quillin, claimants under a certificate tax deed covering six lots in Oklahoma City, brought suit to quiet title against the defendant, Harden. The cause was tried to the court, resulting in a judgment in favor of the defendant.
Plaintiffs upon this appeal present the contention that the judgment is contrary to the evidence.
The trial court found that no notice of application for tax deed was served upon the defendant, and that therefore the deed was void. This court held that the burden was upon the tax deed holder to prove such service of notice in Henderson v. Langley, 173 Okla.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lind v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Lowe v. HickorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Farmers Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City v. GillisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Henderson v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Baker v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tannhauser v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Welborn v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Westerheide v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- In Re Smith's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Blagg v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.