Legal Opinion

Strange v. Los Angeles Examiner

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1932No. Docket No. 8281PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

Appellant, while walking from the southeast to the northeast corner of Sixth Street and Towne Avenue, in the city of Los Angeles, was struck by an auto-truck owned by the corporate respondent, and operated by the other respondents as its employees. For the resultant injuries, due to respondents’ alleged negligence, he seeks in this action to recover damages. The court, at the close of appellant’s case, sustained respondents’ motion for a non-suit and appellant appeals from the judgment thereafter entered. ' In their briefs both parties agree that the judgment can be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Burgesser v. Bullock'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Niosi v. Empire Steam LaundryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Gilmore v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Nickell v. RosenfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wright v. BalesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  2. Baldock v. Western Union Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API