Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Boice

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1894No. 17,301PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

— Abram Boice was elected treasurer of Benton county in the year 1892, and, after assuming the duties of that office, it is alleged, he received in fees collected from persons for services performed as such officer a sum of money which he withheld from the “treasurer’s fund,” established by the act of March 9, 1891. Acts 1891, p. 424, section 125.

It was further alleged that he appropriated said sum to his own use as a part of the compensation of his office, and denied the right of said county to assert or maintain any interest therein.

The relator sued upon the bond of said treasurer for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henderson v. State ex rel. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. State ex rel. McCay v. KrostIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Denney v. State ex rel. BaslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Board of Commissioners v. AlbrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. State ex rel. Colbert v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Walsh v. State ex rel. SoulesIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API