State ex rel. McCay v. Krost
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Lake Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.
— -The appellee was elected recorder of Lake county in the year 1892, and thereafter the appellant’s relator demanded the recording of a mortgage and tendered as the fee therefor the sum of one dollar. Upon the refusal of the appellee to record said mortgage for less than one dollar and twenty-five cents, the appellant’s relator sought and was denied the writ of mandamus to enforce his said demand.
No question is made as to the form of the petition, but the appellee insists that while the act of March 9, 1891 (Acts 1891, p. 424), provides that the fee for the service demanded is one dollar,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Henderson v. State ex rel. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by10 opinions
- Walsh v. State ex rel. SoulesIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Legler v. PaineIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Swartz v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. DarlingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. BoiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.