Warwick v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
WISE, Judge.
The appellant, Scott Thomas Warwick, appeals from the circuit court’s revocation of his probation. Warwick’s appointed counsel has filed a brief in substantial compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Counsel stated that his review of the record revealed no error had occurred in the circuit court’s revocation of Warwick’s probation. This Court issued an order on April 29, 2002, informing Warwick that his counsel had filed an Anders brief and ordering him to file with the Court any issues he believed to be worthy of review. *833Thereafter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Pender v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Ex Parte HittSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- D.B.Y. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- D.B.Y. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
- Maye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Maye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010