Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 8, 2016No. CR-15-0273Published

1DissentKellum, Judge

I cannot agree to overrule Siercks v. State, 154 So.3d 1085 (Ala.Crim.App.2013), and Hawk v. State, 171 So.3d 96 (Ala.Crim.App.2014).

The holding in Siercks, an opinion that I authored, and subsequently in Hawk was not based on the fact that § 13A-12-281, Ala.Code 1975, is written in mandatory terms12 but (1) on the fact that § 13A-12-281 is a sentencing statute and it is well settled law that the imposition of a sen-fence outside the applicable statutory range of punishment, including the applicable statutory fine range, renders a.sentence illegal, which is a jurisdictional defect, see…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SeymourSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Ex Parte CoullietteSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Poole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  5. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API