American United Life Insurance Co. v. Restaurant Hospitality Ass'n of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1DissentBrown, Judge
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s reversal of the grant of summary judgment to the associations. I conclude that a meeting of minds did not occur and that the trial court properly granted the associations’ motion for summary judgment.
“To create a contract of insurance there must be an agreement between the insurer and the insured. There must be a meeting of the minds.” Celina Mut. Cas. Co. v. Baldridge, 218 Ind. 198, 203-204, 10 N.E.2d 904, 906 (1937), reh’g denied. A contract of insurance requires a meeting of the minds of the parties upon the following essential elements of a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stockberger v. Meridian Mutual InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Wabash Grain, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Marquez v. MayerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Meridian Insurance Co. v. ZepedaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- The Celina Mutual Casualty Co. v. BaldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.