Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Devlin
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 2, 2015No. Civil Action No. 13-13126-PBSPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company seeks a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify for a car accident involving a Ford Taurus insured by Metropolitan. The Court has already entered default judgment against Defendants Mary Desrosier (the Taurus’s owner and policyholder), Matthew Desrosier (who was driving the Taurus at the time of the accident), and the Estate of Joseph Simone (who was riding in the Taurus’s backseat). Metropolitan now moves for summary judgment against Defendant Susan Devlin,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Calero-Cerezo v. U.S. Dep of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of DedhamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Sands v. Ridefilm Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cohne v. Navigators Specialty Ins. Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Arch Insurance Company v. Colony Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Cohne v. Navigators Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Endurance American Insurance Co. v. John Moriarty & Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. DevlinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.