Legal Opinion
Pinkney v. Independent School District No. 691
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 23, 1985No. C4-84-1239PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Relators are three teachers who were placed on unrequested leave of absence pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 125.12, subd. 6b (Supp.1983). Relators claim the school board’s enrollment survey did not establish the statutory grounds for placing them on unrequested leave of absence. Relators also claim they were denied due process of law because the hearing examiner had a conflict of interest. We affirm, reverse in part and remand.
FACTS
On April 9, 1984, the school board adopted a resolution proposing to place 14.5 teachers on unrequested leave of absence. The affected…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kroll v. Independent School District No. 593Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Liffrig v. Independent School Dist. No. 442Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, AitkinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Crosby-Ironton Federation of Teachers, Local 1325 v. Independent School District No. 182Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. StarihaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roseville Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 623Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re the Termination of the Coaching Contract of Hahn Ex Rel. Independent School District No. 378Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Bates v. Independent School District No. 482Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Roseville Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 623Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.