Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 17, 1988No. C5-86-1061Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPopovich, Justice

While I concur in that portion of the majority opinion relating to the McDonnell Douglas analysis, holding that Sterling failed to establish a prima facie case of employment discrimination, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the opinion holding the appointment of a hearing examiner was not warranted.

1. I believe this court should extend the trend in Minnesota toward the increasing use of hearing examiners and would affirm the court of appeals’ advice that a hearing examiner should have been appointed. Even the dissent in that court saw the potential unfairness when a reviewing body…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Kroll v. Independent School District No. 593Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Liffrig v. Independent School Dist. No. 442Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, AitkinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API