Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPopovich, Justice
While I concur in that portion of the majority opinion relating to the McDonnell Douglas analysis, holding that Sterling failed to establish a prima facie case of employment discrimination, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the opinion holding the appointment of a hearing examiner was not warranted.
1. I believe this court should extend the trend in Minnesota toward the increasing use of hearing examiners and would affirm the court of appeals’ advice that a hearing examiner should have been appointed. Even the dissent in that court saw the potential unfairness when a reviewing body…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Kroll v. Independent School District No. 593Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Liffrig v. Independent School Dist. No. 442Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, AitkinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.