State v. Harling

The contentions of the defendant raise five issues, to wit:

1. Was it error to allow Dr. Kuhn to give his opinion as a medical expert in response to questions not couched in terms of a “reasonable degree of medical certainty?”

2. Was it error to refuse to allow inquiry on cross-examination regarding any bias Dr. Kuhn might hold generally against abortions ?

3. Should the defense have been allowed to introduce as negative evidence the absence of abortion paraphernalia in defendant’s house when searched by police?

4. Was the evidence sufficient to support a finding of guilty beyond a reasonable…