Legal Opinion
In re Lanois
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided September 10, 2014No. 13-13070Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER (this relates to Doc. ## 39, 44)
DIANE FINKLE, Bankruptcy Judge.
In this Chapter 13 case, secured creditor Bank of America, N.A. (“BOA”) objects to *681the confirmation of Debtor Theodore P. Lanois, Jr.’s proposed Second Amended Chapter 13 plan on the grounds that the Plan’s proposed treatment of BOA’s mortgage claim does not include payment for continuing private mortgage insurance (“PMI”).1 I conclude that the law does not support BOA’s position and the treatment of its claim under the plan is permissible.
I. Jurisdiction
This Court has jurisdiction over this matter…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Till v. SCS Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Lomas Mortgage, Inc. v. Esperandieu & Antonine LouisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Domestic Bank v. Mann (In Re Mann)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2000
- In Re Frances Scarborough, Frances Scarborough v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.