United States v. Dawkins
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
COSTELLO, Judge:
Appellant was convicted by a military jury of solicitation to commit perjury and wrongfully communicating a threat, both in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934. The sentence adjudged and approved is set out above. None of appellant’s attacks on the trial outcome warrant relief, but several merit discussion.
I
Dawkins was a friend of two soldiers, Wynn and Davis, who were being tried for robbery. On the first night of Wynn’s trial and the day before Davis’s began, Dawkins visited the victim, Taylor. While at the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. William RaglandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. BorlandU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. DawdyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. OwensUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983