Legal Opinion
United States v. Borland
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
Decided December 17, 1981No. ACM S25309PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
HODGSON, Chief Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, the accused was convicted of wrongfully using marijuana in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934.1 He was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, three months confinement at hard labor, forfeiture of $200.00 per month for three months, and reduction to airman basic.
Appellate defense counsel have asserted ten assignments of error. Except as discussed below, we resolve these assignments adversely to the accused.
I
The evidence established that at various times during November 1980, the accused, along with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Thomas E. Fench, United States of America v. William H. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. HurtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. Ernest FairchildCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Philip AlbergoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. HeltonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. LipsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
- United States v. WoodyardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. BarrowUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. MansfieldU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. StarkU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.