Legal Opinion

Muck v. Van Bibber

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 16, 1992No. 4-90-0826PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

Plaintiffs, Douglas and Laurie Muck, appeal the dismissal of their amended complaint, in which they alleged they were defamed by defendants, Lester Van Bibber III, Janet Van Bibber, Tena Olmstead, John Olmstead, and Citizens for Justice, Inc. In their complaint, plaintiffs alleged that defendants wrote a letter containing damaging, false statements about them and sent it to the circuit judges of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit when plaintiffs were applicants for the office of associate judge in that circuit. We vacate and remand.

I. Background

In November 1988, defendant Lester Van Bibber III, a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Burdinie v. Village of Glendale HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Mittelman v. WitousIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Estate of Johnson v. Condell Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Costello v. Capital Cities Communications, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People Ex Rel. Madigan v. Petco Petroleum Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. Voyles v. Sandia Mortgage Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. R&G, Inc. v. Midwest Region Foundation for Fair Contracting, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Girsberger v. KreszAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API