Legal Opinion

Mittelman v. Witous

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1990No. 67530PublishedCited by 156 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvo

Plaintiff, Robert Mittelman, filed an action in the circuit court of Cook County charging defendant, John Witous, with slander per se and intentional, willful interference with Mittelman’s “prospective business relationship and contractual expectancy” with the law firm of Clausen, Miller, Gorman, Caffrey and Witous, P.C. (Clausen Miller). Witous served on Clausen Miller’s board of directors. Mittelman’s first amended complaint also charged James Ferrini, another member of Clausen Miller’s board of directors, with breaching a duty to Mittelman in that Ferrini failed to take reasonable steps to…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Rankin v. McPhersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. ConnaughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by156 opinions

  1. Bryson v. News America Publications, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kolegas v. Heftel Broadcasting Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Fellhauer v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Swick v. LiautaudIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. v. GleasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API