Legal Opinion

State v. Willard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 1977No. 34PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant first contends the court erred when it allowed Sheriff Blalock at the pretrial hearing on defendant’s motion to express a personal opinion as to why defendant’s mental condition had changed.

The record of the hearing discloses the following testimony by Sheriff Blalock on direct examination:

“When Bobby came back from the hospital the first time back in November, the jailer let him out on different occasions to do small jobs around the jail and he appeared to be a normal prisoner. The unusual something came up right before the last term or right after the last term…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. State v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. PropstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. FranksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. DeanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API