Legal Opinion

Mobley v. Tinsley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 27, 1923No. 14544, 14584PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

In a suit for commissions, where there is evidence going to show that the defendant as owner authorized the plaintiff to procure a purchaser of certain property, agreeing to pay for such services a stated commission, not on any agreed contract price, but on whatever *260sale amount should be arrived at between himself as owner and any purchaser thus procured, and where it appears that the plaintiff subsequently interested a third person in the purchase and sent him to the defendant with a view to purchasing the property, but where it appears, without dispute, that, although the plaintiff had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Doonan v. IvesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Quist v. GoodfellowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Washington v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Garrett v. WallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Indiana Fruit Co. v. SandlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kuniansky v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Bear Kaufman Realty, Inc. v. Spec Development, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. State Life Insurance Co. v. WhitehurstCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  4. Kuniansky v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. National City Bank of Rome v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API