Kuniansky v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
The court was authorized to find that the agreement under which the property was listed for sale with the broker provided that the sale was to net the defendant owner *679the sum of $22,000 and that all in excess thereof would be retained by the broker as fee or commission. The court was also authorized to find from the evidence that the sale price of the property was $23,500 and not $27,000' as alleged in the petition; that the recited consideration in the deed was inflated for the purpose of obtaining a larger loan; that the plaintiff at no time obtained from the purchaser a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Atlanta Realty Co. v. CampionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Landrum v. Lipscomb-Ellis Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Tidwell v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Mobley v. TinsleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Waring v. John J. Thompson & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Foshee v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- IDEAL REALTY COMPANY v. StorchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Booth v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Bank Building & Equipment Corp. of America v. Georgia State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Gibbs v. NixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.