Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Parker

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1943No. 6511PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

The issues in this cause arise out of the rejection by the receiver of a claim for legal services alleged to have been rendered the corporation by the claimant, and action thereon, and judgment in favor of the claimant, C. D. McNeely, by the Fifth Judicial District Court of the State of Utah, and against J. R. Wood, receiver of the Amassa Gold Mining' Company. The case was tried without a jury.

C. D. McNeely will be referred to herein as “claimant.” He was the only witness. He claimed $500 for legal services on the items set forth in a bill of particulars.

We shall first examine…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spencer v. SowersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Grisham v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  3. Wall v. Niagara Mining & Smelting Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Hodge v. ManleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
  5. Goodsole v. JefferyMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. PearsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  2. Firestone Tire And Rubber Company v. Raynal PearsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. Phillips v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Larada Sciences, Inc. v. SkinnerDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2015
  5. Phillips v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API