Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Smith

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1989No. 20873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Nilda Phillips appeals from an order enforcing an attorney’s lien. Nilda and her now-deceased husband, Elmer Lee Phillips, brought a medical malpractice action, initially retaining the law firm of Ungricht, Randle & Deamer (“the Ungricht firm”). Before any resolution was achieved, the Phillipses terminated their relationship with the Ungricht firm and hired new counsel. The new counsel negotiated a settlement. The Ungricht firm sought to enforce an attorney’s lien on the settlement amount, claiming it was entitled to a contingency fee of one-third of the settlement figure.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Bank and Trust Company v. BybeeUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Midvale Motors, Inc. v. SaundersUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Bishop v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fadel v. Deseret First Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  2. McDonald v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  3. Phillips v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API