Legal Opinion
Massie v. Crawford
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 25, 1991PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Simons, J.
Plaintiff instituted this action in 1985 seeking to recover damages for personal injuries, sustained in January 1984, which allegedly were caused by the presence of an intrauterine birth control device (IUD). The action is against Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation, the manufacturer of the IUD, and defendant Crawford, the gynecologist who inserted it in 1969. Defendant gynecologist moved for partial summary judgment contending that claims of malpractice occurring more than two years and six months prior to January 1984 were time barred. The courts below denied the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Nykorchuck v. HenriquesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rizk v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Davis v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Young v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Sander v. Geib, Elston, Frost Professional Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Williamson v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Gomez v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.