Legal Opinion
Richman v. Albert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 27, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts with costs and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Following a nonjury trial defendants appeal from a judgment based on fraud and strict products liability.
We reverse and dismiss the complaint. Before plaintiffs submitted a purchase offer on a house in Manlius, New York, they retained an architect to inspect the premises and to report its condition. By a report dated March 12, 1976, the architect indicated that the construction did not meet the standards expected for a house of similar size and price. Nevertheless, on that date plaintiffs made a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schiavone Construction Co. v. Elgood Mayo Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Butler v. Caldwell & Cook, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Burnell v. Morning Star Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Pickard v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n & Women's Educational & Industrial Union of AuburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arell's Fine Jewelers, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Rubin v. Telemet America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- St. Mary's Protectress Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church v. Challenger Electrical Equipment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- McCuen v. PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987