Legal Opinion
St. Mary's Protectress Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church v. Challenger Electrical Equipment Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s fourth and eighth causes of action. In its complaint alleging strict products liability, plaintiff alleges that a defective electrical baseboard heater manufactured by defendant caused a fire which resulted in extensive structural damage to plaintiff’s recreation hall. Contrary to defendant’s contention, plaintiff does not seek to recover economic loss only (see, Schiavone Constr. Co. v Mayo Corp., 56 NY2d 667, revg on dissenting opn 81 AD2d 221, 228). The cases upon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Schiavone Construction Co. v. Elgood Mayo Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Schiavone Construction Co. v. Elgood Mayo Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Heller v. U. S. Suzuki Motor Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- County of Chenango Industrial Development Agency v. Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Ferranti-Packard Transformers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1993