Legal Opinion

Diggs v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 22, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A single justice of this court denied the petitioner’s request for relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, and the petitioner appealed. As the petitioner’s direct appeal from his convictions is currently pending before the Appeals Court, he has availed himself of an adequate and effective remedy other than a petition under G. L. c. 211, § 3, through which he may seek the requested relief. Maza v. Commonwealth, 423 Mass. 1006 (1996), and cases cited. “We have emphasized that relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, is extraordinary and may not be sought as a substitute for normal appellate review. Soja…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Soja v. T. P. Sampson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Foley v. Lowell Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Maza v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Diggs v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Clark v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Baldyga v. Dudley Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API