Legal Opinion

Clark v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 9, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In Commonwealth v. Clark, 53 Mass. App. Ct. 342 (2001), the Appeals Court affirmed the trial court’s allowance of the Commonwealth’s motion to correct an amended mittimus. We denied further appellate review. Commonwealth v. Clark, 435 Mass. 1109 (2002). Simultaneously with his prosecution of that appeal, the petitioner sought to raise the same issues in the county court, by filing a petition pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3.

The single justice denied the petition, stating that, “[wjhere a petitioner can raise his claim in the normal course of appeal, as the [petitioner] is doing at present,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foley v. Lowell Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. CowanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. ClarkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  4. Genninger v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Diggs v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ye v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Clark v. BissonnetteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API