Legal Opinion

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,553 United States of America v. Irving M. Drobny

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 16, 1992No. 90-8459PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:

Irving Drobny, who was convicted of securities fraud, brings this collateral attack on his conviction. He says that the district court which convicted him lacked jurisdiction because any misrepresentations he made came five days after the securities sale closed. He also complains of ineffective assistance of counsel. We find no merit in his appeal and affirm the district court’s denial of Drobny’s motion.

I

Because the alleged scheme and the legal issues involve complicated questions under the securities law, we recite the facts in some detail. On collateral review, we view…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. United States v. Roy Lee PierceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. WillisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Leonard Ray Blanton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. GaudetCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API