Legal Opinion

United States v. Willis

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 12, 2001No. 00-20191PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge:

Federal prisoner Joseph Jerome Willis brought the instant 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion pro se, contending that: (1) his § 924(c) firearm conviction was invalid; (2) the jury instructions on the § 924(c) count were erroneous; (3) Willis’ trial attorney performed ineffectively in numerous instances; and (4) his appellate counsel also performed ineffectively by failing to raise several claims on appeal. A magistrate judge issued a report recommending that Willis’ § 2255 motion be denied, and the district judge adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation. Willis now appeals the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Dunbar Armored, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
  2. United States v. MullinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. Oakes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. EkanemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. PuckettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API