Legal Opinion

Tucker v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 1, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogdeN, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover the school site tract of a half acre upon three theories, to wit:

1. That the deed made by Pollard to the school committee in 1877 did not contain the word “heirs.”

2. That the words in said deed “for the use and benefit of the white children in said school district and no further” created or'imposed a trust, so that when the property was abandoned as a school site, it thereupon reverted to the grantor.

3. That the board of education of Pitt County had no title to the property, and hence no authority to convey the same.

It must be conceded that prior to 1879 the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vickers v. . LeighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Hall v. . QuinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Cullens v. . CullensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Brittain v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Brittain v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Asheville v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Charlotte Park & Recreation Commission v. BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Ange v. AngeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Williams v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. First Presbyterian Church of Raleigh v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API