Charlotte Park & Recreation Commission v. Barringer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The decision of the Trial Judge that he had jurisdiction of the property and the parties, and was empowered to enter judgment under the Declaratory Judgment Act is correct. G. S. 1-253 et seq., Lide v. Mears, 231 N.C. 111, 56 S.E. 2d 404.
There are no exceptions to the Judge’s findings of fact.
We shall discuss first the Barringer Deed, which by reference, as well as all the other deeds mentioned in the statement of facts, is incorporated in the findings of fact, and made a part thereof. The first question presented is: Does the Barringer Deed create a fee determinable on special limitations,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Lide v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- First Universalist Society of North Adams v. BolandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- North v. GrahamIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Copenhaver v. PendletonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Charlotte v. Charlotte Park & Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Station Associates, Inc. v. Dare CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Lackey v. Hamlet City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- In Re Applications for Reassignment BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Courts v. Annie Penn Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.