Legal Opinion
Copeland v. City of Dallas
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 24, 1970No. 17433PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAUDE WILLIAMS, Justice.
Edith Renalda Copeland and Dorothy Burgess Reilly (Clem), the surviving heirs of J. P. Burgess and wife, Callie J. Burgess, both deceased, brought this action in trespass to try title against the City of Dallas in which they sought to adjudicate the title, rights to and possession, use and enjoyment of certain lands, situated in a dedicated subdivision known as “The Hampton & Industrial Addition,” said subdivision having been created and dedicated in 1944 by the ancestors and predecessors in title of plaintiffs, and being within the corporate limits of the City of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Oswald v. GrenetTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Adams v. RowlesTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- City of Corsicana v. ZornTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- City of Tyler v. Smith CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- City of Houston v. ScanlanTexas Supreme Court · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Broussard v. Jablecki, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
- Jupe v. City of SchertzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- State v. Nico-Wf1, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
- Jupe v. City of SchertzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.