Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Scanlan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1931No. 5484PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Commissioner RYAN

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was brought by Kate Scanlan and her three sisters against the San Jacinto Construction Company and the city of Houston for damages and to enjoin the defendants from widening and paving the street along and beside block 404 in the city of Houston, which block belongs to the plaintiffs; they claimed title to the strip of land between the curb line and the fence on the southwest side of Calhoun avenue between Main and Fannin streets, being the strip of land desired by the city to widen and pave that street.

The city, by way of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Wolf v. BrassTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. FaberTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Ramthun v. HalfmanTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. International & Great Northern Railroad v. CuneoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. O'CONNOR v. GraggTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Viscardi v. PajestkaTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Greenway Parks Home Owners Ass'n v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Graff v. Whittle, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
  5. Eastex Wildlife Conservation Ass'n v. JASPER, ETC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API