Legal Opinion

Gustafson v. Seattle Traction Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1902No. 3941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Orange Jacobs, Judge pro tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, C. J.

— Action for damages for personal injuries. The superintendent of the defendant street railway company was driving piles in repairing the track of the street railroad. The pile driver was so> constructed that the gins (that is, the upright pieces between which the hammer plays when the driver is in operation) could be raised and lowered. They were built upon a fulcrum about the center of the car. When the driver was removed from place to place, the gins were turned down, so as to lie lengthwise of the car. When the driver was in operation,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beaubien v. CicotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  2. People v. SeamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Burney v. TorreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. State v. HundleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  5. Grisby v. Clear Lake Water Works Co.California Supreme Court · 1870

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nelson v. McLellanWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Security Benefit Assn. v. SmallArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  3. McLeod v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Hale v. Crown Columbia Pulp & Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Otter v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API