Legal Opinion

Lawton v. Hanover Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 15, 2010Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Bernadette Lawton (“Lawton”) has appealed the allowance *267of summary judgment for the defendant, Hanover Insurance Company (“Hanover”), on her claim of breach of her automobile insurance policy.

The following facts are undisputed. While driving her motor vehicle that was insured by Hanover, Lawton sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident. Her automobile insurance policy with Hanover included $8,000.00 in personal injury protection (“PIP”) coverage and $5,000.00 in optional medical payments (“MedPay^ coverage. Lawton was also insured at the time under a health insurance policy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Mejia v. American Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  3. Kingsley v. SpoffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Carter v. SetoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005
  5. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API