Legal Opinion
Carter v. Seto
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided June 1, 2005PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.
This is an action by former tenants Kara L. and Charles R. Carter (the “Carters”) to recover for violations of the security deposit law, G.L.c. 186, §15B, and of G.L.c. 93A by their former landlord, defendant Mae Seto (“Seto”).2 The trial court entered summary judgment for Seto on the parties’ Mass. R. Civ. R, Rule 56, cross-motions, and the Carters brought this Dist./Mun. Cts. R.A.D. A., Rule 8A, expedited appeal.3
The record indicates that the Carters executed a written lease of an apartment in Newton for an original eleven-month term beginning September 1,1998. They remained in possession…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- McGrath v. MisharaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Mattoon v. City of PittsfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Mellor v. BermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Makrigiannis v. Nintendo of America, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Taylor v. BeaudryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Dolben Co. v. FriedmannMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
- Farineau v. EasleyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
- Oxford Business Brokers, Inc. v. MoriartyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
- Public Works Supply Co. v. C & O Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.