Legal Opinion
Tail Active Sportswear v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 26, 1992No. Court 91-09-00662PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NEWMAN, Senior Judge:
INTRODUCTION
This action purports to place in issue the proper tariff classification and rate of duty under the Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the United States (“HTSUS”) for certain men’s wearing apparel imported by plaintiff from Hong Kong and entered in September 1989 at the port of Miami, Florida. Plaintiff filed administrative protests with the District Director of Customs (“Customs”) against the liquidation and reliqui-dation of the subject entry. The protest against the liquidation was approved by Customs regarding women’s wearing apparel, but the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Computime, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Pagoda Trading Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Audiovox Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Audiovox Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chrysal USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Amoco Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Estee Lauder Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011