Legal Opinion

Amoco Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 9, 2005No. Slip Op. 05-156; Court 99-00399Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RIDGWAY, Judge.

In this action, Plaintiff Amoco Corporation challenges the denial by the U.S. Customs Service 1 (“Customs”) of its protest of Customs’ classification of 30 entries covering 19 different but similar epoxy molding compounds (“EMCs”) imported from 1995 to 1997. 2

Amoco contends that the EMCs are classifiable as “epoxide resins in primary forms,” under subheading 3907.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 3 (“HTSUS”), dutiable at a rate of 6.1% ad valorem. See generally Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (“PL’s Brief’);…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API