Legal Opinion

Pue v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1926No. 6,022PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff rendered by the district court of Silver Bow county on appeal from a justice of the peace court of that county. But two questions are raised: (1) As to the jurisdiction of the court; and (2) as to the sufficiency of the evidence.

The complaint alleges that defendant is a foreign corporation, and that it “owes plaintiff $135.40 for sanitary work performed at the special instance and request of defendant, in defendant’s Helena yards,” etc. The summons was served on defendant’s agent in Silver Bow county. Jurisdiction was questioned by motion to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parrot v. Mexican Central Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Boyer v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Waechter v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. Stone v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Eickhoff v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern Railroad v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Foley v. General Motors Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Mercy v. A. I. Hall & Son, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Hanlon v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Lohman v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API