Burlington Northern Railroad v. Ford
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter
Montana’s venue rules permit a plaintiff to sue a corporation incorporated in that State only in the county of its principal place of business, but permit suit in any county against a corporation incorporated elsewhere. This case presents the question whether the distinction in treatment offends the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, U. S. Const., Arndt. 14, § 1. We hold that it does not.
Respondents William D. Ford and Thomas L. Johnson were employed by petitioner Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a corporation owing its existence to the laws of Delaware and having a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Syed Hassan v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Busby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Harris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Margola Associates v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1993
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.