Legal Opinion

Burlington Northern Railroad v. Ford

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 12, 1992No. 91-779PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter

Montana’s venue rules permit a plaintiff to sue a corporation incorporated in that State only in the county of its principal place of business, but permit suit in any county against a corporation incorporated elsewhere. This case presents the question whether the distinction in treatment offends the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, U. S. Const., Arndt. 14, § 1. We hold that it does not.

Respondents William D. Ford and Thomas L. Johnson were employed by petitioner Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a corporation owing its existence to the laws of Delaware and having a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Syed Hassan v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  3. Busby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Harris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Margola Associates v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1993

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API