Legal Opinion

Repauno Chemical Co. v. Victor Hardware Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1900No. 1,226PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. The Repauno Chemical Company instituted this action against the Victor Hardware Company on August 2, 1897, 'and caused a writ of attachment to be issued and levied on a stock of merchandise, and certain accounts were also garnished as the property of the defendant, the Victor Hardware Company.

Read the full summary

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. The Repauno Chemical Company instituted this action against the Victor Hardware Company on August 2, 1897, 'and caused a writ of attachment to be issued and levied on a stock of merchandise, and certain accounts were also garnished as the property of the defendant, the Victor Hardware Company. H. B. Roby filed her intervention in the cause, .claiming both the stock of goods and the accounts seized under the writ of attachment as her property, alleging that she purchased the same from the Victor Hardware Company…

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, Circuit Judge

There are a number of errors assigned, hut in the brief of the learned counsel for the plaintiff in error, who did not try the case below, only two of the assignments of error are set out and relied upon. In City of Lincoln v. Sun Vapor Street-Light Co., 19 U. S. App. 431, 8 C. C. A. 253, 59 Fed. 756, we .announced our purpose to. require a com*950pliance with rule 24 of this court, and it has been applied in numerous cases since. Haldane v. U. S., 32 U. S. App. 607, 16 C. C. A. 447, 69 Fed. 819; National Bank of Commerce of Kansas City v. First Nat. Bank, 27 U. S. App. 88, 10 C. C. A. 87, 61…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thiede v. Utah TerritorySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Chateaugay Ore & Iron Co. v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. City of Lincoln v. Sun Vapor Street-Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  4. Paxson v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  5. Philip Schneider Brewing Co. v. American Ice-Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. Central Fuel Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  2. Proechel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Foster v. McAlesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  4. Holt Manufacturing Co. v. BenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. United States v. SidenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API