Legal Opinion

Hyers v. Western & Southern Life Ins

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 18, 1929No. 911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, J.

There are two basic propositions upon which the petition must be tested:

1. Is the action equitable in character, or is it a simple action at law in quantum meruit?

2. Are the proceeds now held by the Insurance Company, or so much of them as may be decreed by the court to be due plaintiffs, subject to a lien of plaintiffs?

In 'our judgment, both questions are answered in cases which this court is bound to accept as controlling. These decisions are Walcutt vs. Huling, etc., et al., 5 Ohio Appellate Reports, decided by this court in the Franklin County Court of Appeals, and Roberts, et al.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Huling v. City of Columbus, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Irwin & Flickinger v. Bruce L. Christy Co., L.P.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API