Legal Opinion
Huling v. City of Columbus
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division
Decided September 23, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Kínkead, J.
The defendant, Walcutt, obtained a judgment against the city of Columbus. Plaintiff was his attorney, and brings this action for the recovery of compensation for his services.
The petition sets forth the facts concerning the action prosecuted by Walcutt against the city of Columbus, wherein recovery was had for $26,255.13. Two causes of action were pleaded in the petition, the first in quantum meruit, wherein it was claimed that the services were reasonably worth $10,000.
The second cause sets forth a claim of Frank A. Davis, who was original counsel for Walcutt, the various facts…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Goodrich v. . McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Marshall v. . MeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Rooney v. . Second Avenue Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- President of the Michigan State Bank v. HastingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1844
- Buchan v. SumnerNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hyers v. Western & Southern Life InsOhio Court of Appeals · 1929