Roberts v. Montgomery
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKinkade, J.
This is an action to determine the ownership and secure the possession of a certain sum of money, amounting to $5,500, held in trust. The action involves the question of the correct measure of damages resulting from the breach of a contract for professional services to be rendered by lawyers. The controlling facts are not in dispute.
The plaintiffs in error, herein referred to as plaintiffs, are a law partnership • practicing in Cleveland. They have had extensive and successful experience in the prosecution of personal injury cases.
The defendants in error Montgomery, husband and wife,…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Reid, Johnson, Downes, Andrachik & Webster v. LansberryOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Allen, Heaton & McDonald, Inc. v. Castle Farm Amusement Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
- Sonkin & Melena Co., L.P.A. v. ZaranskyOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Roberts v. HuttonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.