Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Montgomery

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1926No. 19674PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKinkade, J.

This is an action to determine the ownership and secure the possession of a certain sum of money, amounting to $5,500, held in trust. The action involves the question of the correct measure of damages resulting from the breach of a contract for professional services to be rendered by lawyers. The controlling facts are not in dispute.

The plaintiffs in error, herein referred to as plaintiffs, are a law partnership • practicing in Cleveland. They have had extensive and successful experience in the prosecution of personal injury cases.

The defendants in error Montgomery, husband and wife,…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Reid, Johnson, Downes, Andrachik & Webster v. LansberryOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Allen, Heaton & McDonald, Inc. v. Castle Farm Amusement Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Sonkin & Melena Co., L.P.A. v. ZaranskyOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Roberts v. HuttonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API