Legal Opinion

Landowners Co. v. Pendry

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1940No. 34,636PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*675The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

This was an action under the forcible detainer statute for the possession of property in the business district of Topeka. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff defendants appeal.

On June 22,1933, Dana MacYicar, owner, executed a lease covering the premises in question for a term of five years, beginning January 1,1934, at a stipulated rental, to the defendants H. E. and A. L. Pendry.

The lease contained the following provision:

“The parties of the second part shall have the right to the first option in case they may desire to continue to occupy…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. R. I. Realty Co. v. TerrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Cloverdale Co. v. LittlefieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Blythe v. GibbonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Buddenberg v. WelchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Burbach v. . SinramNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. RussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Falkenstein v. PopperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Stein v. ReisingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Crecente v. VernierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Jamison v. LindblomOhio Court of Appeals · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API