Legal Opinion
Crecente v. Vernier
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1949No. 5160PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRICE, Chief Justice.
This action was brought by appellee to enforce the specific performance of that portion of a purported contract containing, as it is alleged, an option to purchase certain real estate, which he claimed the right to exercise. From an adverse judgment the defendant has appealed to this court.
The court’s decision is as follows:
“Findings of Fact
“(1) That both plaintiff and defendant are residents of the County of Sandoval, State of New Mexico
“(2) On the 3rd day of November, 1945, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement in writing in words and figures as follows:
“…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- R. I. Realty Co. v. TerrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Swift & Co. v. Columbia Ry., Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Cloverdale Co. v. LittlefieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Buddenberg v. WelchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
- Landowners Co. v. PendrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lommori v. Milner Hotels, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- May v. WaltersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Solomon v. AblesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- HLH Enterprises, Inc. v. Chavez (In re Chavez)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1982
- Kintner v. Wruble, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Wyoming County1958