Legal Opinion
Hurst v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 8, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge PELLEGRINI.
Floyd Hurst (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming that portion of the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) decision denying his claim petition and reversing that portion of the WCJ’s decision granting one of his penalty petitions.
Claimant was employed as a driver by Preston Trucking Company (Employer). On July 17,1998, Claimant was involved in a motor vehicle accident when the tractor-trailer truck he was driving flipped over. Employer issued a Notice of Temporary Compensation Payable (NTCP) on July 29, 1998,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Somerset Welding & Steel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Murphy v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Kramer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Rite Aid Corp.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Sellers v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barrett v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Galizia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- H.A. Harper Sons, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Barrett v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010