Haar v. Vogelman Bakery Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Helm
Affirming.-
Appellant, Louis Haar, by Ms next friend, Edward Haar, resting Ms ease on what is known as the “attractive nuisance” doctrine, sought damages because of a burn. The trial court sustained a demurrer to .the petition as amended. Appellant appeals from the judgment dismissing the petition.
Appellant alleges that appellee, Yogelman Bakery, Inc., owns a garage on Patton Street in Covington where it maintains and services its trucks; that in the garage there is “a gasoline pump for the purpose of filling the trucks with gasoline, and * * * by the gasoline pump on the floor it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dahl v. Valley Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Watral's Adm'r v. Appalachian Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Duff v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Jarvis v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Jones Savage Lumber Company v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baggett v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
- Greater Louisville First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
- Collins v. Liquid TransportersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- Scott v. Oscar Ewing Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958