Legal Opinion

Haar v. Vogelman Bakery Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 21, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Helm

Affirming.-

Appellant, Louis Haar, by Ms next friend, Edward Haar, resting Ms ease on what is known as the “attractive nuisance” doctrine, sought damages because of a burn. The trial court sustained a demurrer to .the petition as amended. Appellant appeals from the judgment dismissing the petition.

Appellant alleges that appellee, Yogelman Bakery, Inc., owns a garage on Patton Street in Covington where it maintains and services its trucks; that in the garage there is “a gasoline pump for the purpose of filling the trucks with gasoline, and * * * by the gasoline pump on the floor it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dahl v. Valley Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Watral's Adm'r v. Appalachian Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. Duff v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Jarvis v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  5. Jones Savage Lumber Company v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baggett v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  2. Greater Louisville First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  3. Collins v. Liquid TransportersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  4. Scott v. Oscar Ewing Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API