State Ex Rel. Murray v. Riley
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, Judge.
The object of the petition for mandamus was to compel the trustees of the Firemen’s Pension Fund to redetermine relator’s pension rights as a retired fireman under Chap. 118, Vol. 33 Laws of Delaware.
Relator (Plaintiff-in-error) was a fireman who retired on November 17, 1945. Under the provisions of Chap. 118, Vol. 33 Delaware Laws, as amended, Vol. 35 Laws of Del., c. 88, he became entitled to a pension of “* * * one-half of the amount of his salary at the time of retirement * * The question presented is the amount of relator’s actual salary as of his retirement for the purpose…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brophy v. Cities Service Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
- Blaustein v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1946
- State v. AbbottSuperior Court of Delaware · 1946
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BlackSuperior Court of Delaware · 1951
- Borough of Beaver v. ListonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Coco v. School Committee of BoylstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Eisenstadt v. County of SuffolkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Norman v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.