Legal Opinion

State v. Black

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided September 26, 1951No. Civil Action No. 60, 1951PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, J.:

The first question calls for a determination as to whether, from the lánguage of the agreement itself, compensation was intended to be on a monthly or a per diem basis. Even a casual reading of the contract indicates clearly that a monthly basis of payment was contemplated. The word “salary” occurs throughout the agreement. In State ex rel. Murray v. Riley, 70 A. 2d 712, 713, 14 A. L. R. 2d 630, the Supreme Court of Delaware defined “salary”, as: “* * * regular compensation at fixed periods without regard to the number of days ¿dually worked so long as the employee is in good…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Murray v. RileySupreme Court of Delaware · 1949
  2. Tillman v. City of CarthageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Siaca v. DCC Operating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  2. Realty Growth Investors v. Council of Unit OwnersSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Town of Cheswold v. Central Delaware Business ParkSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  4. Habets v. Waste Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  5. Lipson v. Anesthesia Services, P.A.Superior Court of Delaware · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API